No on P Mailer

Click on image to enlarge.

Here is the first mailer I have seen from a group opposed to Measure P, The Marymount Plan.

I made only a few subtle changes to the text on the second image.

I added information about the fact that had Marymount not offer to pay the entire cost of the Special Election called for by the City Council, Rancho Palos Verdes taxpayers would have had funds already collected as taxes used to pay for the election that would only benefit Marymount College.

In essence, had Marymount not 'offered' to pay for the measure concerning The Marymount Plan, taxpayers would be on the hook for that part of The Marymount Plan that involves approving it in the first place. They would also be on the hook for paying the election's bills when the measure fails. This means that no matter what the outcome of the voting is, had Marymount not offered, taxpayers would get stuck with the Special Election costs.

For the question about whether the City Council already approved most of The Marymount Plan when it approved The Marymount College Facilities Expansion Project, I changed "Much of it." to "Almost all of it." because my words are factually more accurate.

The City Council also added an element, which they approved, that makes The Marymount College Facilities Expansion Project safer, many believe than The Marymount Plan which I feel offers too little safety because of dorms on campus.

As for looking for our names on http://www.saverpv.com/, they are not on the list of those endorsing the group.

Terri and I do endorse all opposition groups opposed to The Marymount Plan, Measure P, while we do continue to strongly support The Marymount College Facilities Expansion Project.

Terri and I disagreed with the Appeal filed by CCC/ME and were heartened when the City Council denied that Appeal.